The Great Spectacle: 250 years of the Summer Exhibition
4 stars – I really liked this exhibition
In this, the Royal Academy’s 250th anniversary, there is a companion exhibition to the annual Summer Exhibition and it tells the story of the Summer Exhibition and provides a survey of British Art over the quarter millennium.
With the Summer Exhibition stuffing the main exhibition rooms with art, the Great Spectacle shows off not just the art but also the smaller suite of rooms that were designed for the Academicians and their Council and their General Assembly. Find the entrance to the right as you walk up the main staircase of the Piccadilly-facing Burlington House and pick up an audio guide if you can since it’s worth the extra cost.
Linger in the first room, the Tennant Gallery, to study William Powell Frith’s Private View from 1881, a gorgeous, colourful view of Victorian visitors to that year’s Exhibition including Oscar Wilde surrounded by admiring women; Millais, the pre-Raphaelite; and Anthony Trollope, taking notes, just like I was!
The exhibition shows views of the Exhibition in all the Royal Academy’s homes: Pall Mall, Somerset House, Trafalgar Square and Burlington House. It also provides an overview of the key moments over the years, including the star paintings of different years and a sense of the ebbs and flow in the popularity and significance of the Exhibition and the Academy. I’m sure everyone will take a different memory away from it.
I was particularly struck by the irony of how women were treated. Two founding members of the Royal Academy in 1768 were women but after that the Academy retreated from its equality and elected a full Royal Academician only in 1936. One work by a woman was the star of the 1874 Exhibition with queues waiting to see it and a battle to own it, which HM Queen Victoria won when the man who had commissioned it ceded the field to his queen. Despite this great acclaim, the artist, Elizabeth, Lady Butler, née Thompson, missed out on RA status two years later by two votes. The work was a painting, entitled Calling the Roll after an Engagement, Crimea and it is a fine painting of a line of men mostly in bearskins, some wounded, all battered, with a mounted officer dominating the left hand side and a flock of birds flying through the air in a tick formation.
Apart from that there were a fair number of works on display by women and also, in this year of celebrating the partial –franchise, a reminder that political events touched the annual art extravaganza: on 4 May 1914 Mary Wood, a suffragette, slashed John Singer Sargent’s portrait of Henry James. She selected that picture because it involved two international figures so brought lots of publicity; and she was protesting not just the issue of votes but also the lack of recognition of women artists.
I enjoyed seeing all the artworks and seeing the evolution from history pictures, through portraits and landscapes and genre paintings to the point where the Pre-Raphaelites arrived and the colours became jewelled and the detail fabulous. There is an extraordinary piece by Rodin, cast in bronze but showing life-like detail of muscle and sinew – Rodin exhibited it first in Paris in 1877 but then brought it to London in 1884. By then, he saw the RA as a key international venue and that would have pleased the founders of the RA who wanted to raise the status of British art.
Then the 20th century brought the treatment of war and the fight between the traditionalists and the modernists of various generations. I loved the satirical piece by the ex-President, Sir Alfred Mummings PRA, called Does the Subject Matter? Exhibited in 1956 in shows 4 elegantly dressed patrons studying abstract art. It is witty and charming but remember, this is also the chap who took advantage of the broadcasting of the 1949 RA dinner (reinstated after the war at Churchill’s urging) to resign as President and to lambast modern art. Munnings probably wouldn’t have been happy with the last couple of rooms of the exhibition, which show how modern art gradually made its way into the Exhibition.
One of the charms of an exhibition like this is that you have a chance to see details in famous paintings. For example, Annigoni’s 1955 portrait of HM Queen Elizabeth II was a familiar image. However, I didn’t know it contained a self-portrait. The piece was commissioned by The Worshipful Company of Fishmongers. In recognition of this, Annigoni painted a small boat in the left-hand bottom corner of the landscape background and painted himself into the boat, fishing!
In summary, it is a lovely exhibition about a 250-year-old Exhibition, giving an insight into art and Britain over those years. It is on at the Royal Academy in London until its last day of 19 August 2018 and you can find more information here.
What a lovely idea, matching artists’ possessions with their starring roles in paintings and sculpture! That’s what you’ll find at Matisse in the Studio at the Royal Academy of Arts in the Sackler Wing until 12 November 2017.
The three rectangular spaces of the Sackler Wing are divided into six areas covering different periods of Henri Matisse’s life and work. Art works by Matisse – paintings and sculptures and maquettes for his design work – are displayed in close proximity to furniture and domestic objects that feature in them or inspired his approach. You can find out more, and see some photographs of the exhibits, here.
Not only does the exhibition give us “a rare glimpse into the artist’s personal collection, as well as the paintings, sculptures and drawings it inspired” but it also provides a great overview of Matisse and his style as it developed over his lifetime. Especially useful for someone like me to whom Matisse was just a name.
A unifying feature of the exhibition is colour. The wild colour from his earlier works suggested even to me that he was probably one of the “Fauves”, or wild things, of the early twentieth century – that knowledge comes from a novel I read way back when, not from art history where linking Matisse and fauvism is a slam dunk. The colour continues right to the bright contrasting tones of his later cut-outs, a way of creating art when he could no longer paint like he used to. And, in the middle of all of this, sculpture, which I did not know he did and which, truth be told, introduces a solid ballast of black.
The two earliest rooms contain mostly domestic items: chairs, tables, ewers and chocolate pots or chocolatiers. The latter with their bulbous silver bodies and wooden handles seem a comfortably bourgeois object for an artist to use. Seeing two examples of chocolatiers next to paintings containing them delighted me. The way Matisse used them and distorted their shapes slightly and played with the light, was interesting.
There was a Venetian chair with both its back and seat made in the shape of a clam-like shell and arms shaped like fish, or maybe dolphin, heads. It made me smile and then so did seeing the chair represented in the painting.
Odalisque in Yellow Robe from 1937 shows a woman with brown curls and wearing a green skirt and pale green blouse under a long yellow and purple or brown striped robe. She is seated next to an octagonal table decorated in yellow flowers on a blue background and a grey jug filled with flowers and with a curved pattern on its bulbous body. The real life objects sit next to the painting. The table, made by an Algerian craftsman, is more turquoise than in the painting. The ewer from Northern France is made from pewter. Its top section is a straight column but its lower section seems to be made of half tubes of metal their concave side on the outside, which is conveyed by simple curved lines on the painting. They are exquisite pieces.
As you move through the rest of the exhibition, you see examples of more exotic articles: African masks, Islamic art on furniture and drapery. The curators say “seen together, they reveal how Matisse’s masterful vision of rich and masterful energy first stemmed from the collage of patterns and rhythms which he found in the world of objects.” However, even they, in their wall panels qualify that, suggesting that Matisse had a vision and that these articles and the examples of decorative arts from around the world helped him to develop the vision and make it more concrete.
In the sculpture section, The Serpentine, modelled in 1909 and cast in 1948, is shown next to a picture of a plump white-skinned nude as an influence. The Serpentine does stand like the woman in the picture but Matisse has extended the length of the legs, body and pedestal, making the sculpture thin, the torso almost square in cross section. I’d be interested in knowing why he did that. Also, I noticed that many of the sculptures had similar dates, including those of his wife and daughter but no explanation as to why so many modelled early in the century and not cast until its middle. I wonder why.
The relationship between Matisse’s art and items that inspired or influenced it is also demonstrated in an oil on canvass painting, Standing Nude 1906/7. Next to the painting is a much smaller photograph of a young woman in the same pose, although her hair, curls or her hair up looks like artifice in the context of the picture. The painting shows the influence of the African masks and sculptures that Matisse was collecting and studying. The body and the face are much more angular than the in the photograph although strangely in the face it doesn’t seem as different, it just looks like a good way to capture the planes of the human face.
There are a couple of examples of African masks, like the Muyombi Mask from DR Congo. They are impressive objects using beads and shells to suggest beards. They reminded me of the piece by Gilbert and George RA in the Summer Exhibition in the galleries below.
There are several representations of his wife and of his daughter, Marguerite. He strove to create portraits that “suggest the deep gravity that persists in every human being.” Two portraits of Marguerite interested me. In 1906, he created a portrait that is quite bland really – a few brushstrokes make her almost a cartoon. In 1916, again with a black ribbon around her throat, he painted her with more colour, although still quite subdued, and the planes and shadows of her face create a sense of a great deal of character and determination.
In contrast to the 1906 portrait of Marguerite, where a few brushstrokes made the portrait more abstract, there was a painting from 1948 – “Large Mask” – it was about 6 or 7 brush marks of aquatint and it conveyed real character – a little coquetry and a quizzical look.
I did enjoy seeing the Islamic art. There was a screen and a piece of a material called a “haiti” and more furniture – a brazier and its tray in copper, brass and wood and an octagonal chair. The haiti shows an pattern of two arches filled with geometric patterns in soft greens and reds. The screen was brighter but still in the geometric style. They feature in many of his paintings of the period. In some ways it is hard to understand that what Matisse did, learning and drawing inspiration from these pieces was so amazing, because this sort of style is relatively accessible to us. However, he studied their features and took them into his art rather than simply representing them as exotic orientalism so I guess that what he did was different at the time he did it.
The final section demonstrates his “cut out period”. He cut out shapes and stuck them on the walls while he decided the exact composition to make of them. There is a photograph of a place he was staying, a quite ordinary room, where he did just that: the walls covered with sinuous shapes. He must have been a complete nightmare as a guest!
His work became quite abstract, perhaps influenced by Islamic art’s avoidance of depicting people. However, it is an abstraction that is intended to have meaning rather than leaving the meaning to the viewer, I think. There are algae, masks and people in the shapes.
So, that’s the exhibition.
The RA has made a particular point about keeping control of the number of visitors so that even Friends have to get a timed ticket and can’t just wander in as normal. I’m not entirely sure the exhibition space is that much harder to navigate than in any other exhibition. Maybe all exhibitions would benefit from that level of control. However, I’m wondering if I should say that too loudly – I like the freedom just to wander into an exhibition when I like and this experience might encourage them to change the rules for all exhibitions.
Anyway, while you are waiting for your timeslot, pop into the Second Nature: The Art of Charles Tunnicliffe RA in the Tenant Gallery, a small room right by the first floor access to the lift to the Sackler Galleries. This is free with your exhibition ticket. Charles Tunnicliffe was a wildlife illustrator and you’ll see examples of his etchings and engravings. They are truly beautiful – and one for those who are looking for “proper art”. Find out more here.
Quick! Quick! Roll up to Hokusai: beyond the Great Wave at British Museum. Don’t worry, it is open until 13 August 2017 but it is closed from Monday 3 to Thursday 6 July 2017 to swap out some of the more fragile works. So, you will miss some of the works if you don’t go this weekend. I didn’t take a careful note of all the works that are “25 May to 2 July only”. Year-End Accounts, an early highlight, is one, Suspension Bridge on the border between Hazen and Etchū provinces is another, but I’m not sure of the rest. I’m thinking of going back again to see the new set in any case but I realise that might not be possible for everyone.
Katsushika Hokusai was an artist in Japan in the late 18th and early 19th century. This exhibition focuses on the last thirty years of his life, a period that includes one of his best known works, The Great Wave. The exhibition is in Room 35, the Joseph Hotung Great Court Gallery, the circular exhibition space built over the old reading room in the centre of the Great Court. It costs £12, details on the website here which also shows ten highlights of the exhibition so it is worth looking there before attending.
They have turned room 35 into a long corridor. It’s a slow labyrinth of a gallery as a result but if you follow the line of visitors patiently you will find treasure! This could be somewhat claustrophobic but it is perhaps the only way to allow the number of visitors in to see the works. There is some good context from the wall panels but they are a little small and sometimes on the far side of a work which is hard to get to.
The first section of the exhibition deals with examples of art from Hokusai’s earlier work, paintings and prints, and introduces the idea of his calling himself by different names as he went through his life. This is good background. It also shows how he developed his art. There is an interesting explanation of how he studied and used European techniques, for example, the difference between European perspective with a vanishing point and Japanese perspective where further away things were shown above nearer things and, also, the idea of showing one side of an object in a lighter tone creating the impression of a light source from one side or the other. One example of Hokusai demonstrating his ability to do both is New Year Scene, created in 1824-26 for the Dutch East India company, it shows a Japanese street scene with a man and children ready to fly kites in the foreground and others with kites already aloft and the impression of buildings receding into the background. Light hits them from one side. It is beautiful.
The second section then builds up to the print series, 36 views of Mt Fuji. This is followed by sections on landscapes, flora and fauna, followed by supernatural beings; then a little section about his daughter before final very late artworks.
The 36 Views of Mount Fuji was a piece of work that saved Hokusai’s finances at a difficult time. The views seek to show the growing light from darkness and show landscapes and seascapes from all over Japan but each one featuring Mount Fuji, which plays a significant role in Japanese culture. Sometimes Mount Fuji is a small distinct shape in the background. For example, a barrel-maker carves the inside of a huge barrel, resting on its side, and above his head you can see a tiny triangle. Other times, it dominates the scene. The prints used Prussian blue, newly available in Japan, as well as the more common indigo.
The Great Wave, Under the wave off Kanagawa, to give it its full title, is one of the 36 Views. It shows three open rowing boats in high seas with Mount Fuji in the distance. The shapes of the waves echo the slopes of the mountain and the biggest of the waves rears up almost like a beast waiting to devour the boats. Earlier in the exhibition, you can see Cargo Ship with Wave from 1805 where the wave seems almost wooden and immobile. In the later work, the foam falling from the wave resembles the claws of an animal, still not quite figurative but representing the power of the wave. It is certainly worth seeing in person.
There is a certain stylised quality to all the art work, less noticeable in the images of flora and fauna but certainly there in the landscapes and the depictions of people. I wondered if Japanese people, particularly of the period, interpreted the images as stylised or saw them as accurate depictions of the individuals.
For us now it seems very alien except for an unexpected similarity to the illustrations in the Discworld books, particular the original artwork on the UK editions of the first 26 books. Josh Kirby is the name of this artist. Warrior Hero Tametomo, painted in 1811, is one example where we saw this likeness. You can see this painting here.
I saw this cartoon quality in many of the prints. That is not said to diminish them but to recognise that they have a particular style that is found more in that genre these days. Occasionally it doesn’t work for me. For example, Rainstorm Beneath the Summit has some striking and brightly red jagged lines in its bottom right quadrant. This is meant to show lightning accompanying rain on the slopes below the summit. However, for me it looked like a lava flow, which could have made sense, given the fact that it is a volcano.
Having said that, I liked the examples of the 36 Views that I saw (the exhibition does not show the whole set). The dominant blue colours do suggest early dawn. The varied landscapes of Japan are beautiful. If you want to see them all or to prepare for a visit, have a good look at the Wikipedia page to prepare for the riches. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty-six_Views_of_Mount_Fuji
I was intrigued by the prints entitled Clear Day with Southern Breeze. There was a “Pink Fuji” and a “Red Fuji” with that title, each taking its nickname from the colour of Mount Fuji in the print. The interpretations explain that the printing process means that the lighter coloured ink is normally the earlier impression and is understood to be closer to the artist’s intention. It was certainly true that Pink Fuji has a subtlety and details that Red Fuji lacks.
This does suggest a question. For prints, who should get the praise: the original artist or the engraver and printer who renders that onto the page? Is it a combination of the vision of the second and the detailed technical skill of the first? Neither can produce the work without the other. There is a film shown on two TVs about the printer’s craft. Maybe you can decide.
I was particularly fond of the Mishima Pass in Kai Province. A group of travellers is taking a break from the road. Some are hugging a tree to try to gauge its breadth. Another is having a quick smoke and washing his feet. They are charming.
After the 36 Views, the later sections show some wonderful depictions of life, some fantastical, some realistic. I really wished I had a magnifying glass to appreciate the details although I am not sure that would have been popular with my fellow visitors.
The supernatural pieces can be quite grotesque and we miss out on some of the effect if we aren’t familiar with the stories depicted. However, it is the right time of year because, apparently, it is on hot summer nights that Japanese people tell one another ghost stories.
One landscape is called 100 Bridges at a Glance. It is the sort of painting where the more you look, the more you see. However, don’t worry if you start to count: apparently, he painted only 50 bridges not the eponymous 100!
There are quite a few bridges in the exhibition and lots of water and waterfalls. I guess Japan has a lot, given that there are also lots of prints entitled “sudden shower of rain”. Suspension Bridge on the border between Hazen and Etchū provinces is one of the bridges and you can see it only until 1 July. If you miss it, I can tell you it looks quite precarious, a walkway that dips with the weight of the two figures on it and no handrails that I can see!
Hokusai’s waterfalls look very solid. Conveying the impression of water in paintings has long been a topic that has interested painters – David Hockney amongst them. I don’t know that Hokusai succeeds but, on the other hand, waterfalls, at least in spate, can look very solid so maybe he has a point.
The last section has some wonderful, larger format paintings. I particularly liked the Tiger in Rain hissing at the Dragon Tornado to his right. These paintings are companion pieces but are rarely shown together, which is a shame because they look good side by side.
The paintings are presented on scrolls, the painting itself a panel within a highly decorated larger piece of material. I suppose it is like the frames we find on European paintings but these scrolls are very elaborate. I can’t tell if they have been themselves painted or embroidered or woven but they are covered with complex patterns in colours that, at their best, complement the painting. For example, towards the end of the exhibition in the mythological section, the gold, red and blue of the scroll picks out the colours within the painting itself, enhancing them.
The exhibition claims to “lead you on an artistic journey through the last 30 years of Hokusai’s life”. It allows you to “explore Hokusai’s personal beliefs and gain a fascinating insight into the artist’s spiritual and artistic quest”. I’m not convinced I gained such an insight into his quest although I saw the evidence of what he produced during the period. In other words, he painted lots of landscapes and supernatural pictures but just by seeing them I am not any wiser as to his motivation.
Here is the big question that has been bugging me: what are the boundary lines between a museum that, I think, seeks to understand the diversity of the human condition and an art gallery that focuses on the “artistic” response to it? In other words, why is the British Museum hosting an exhibition of art from early 19th Century Japan? Does it cause conflict and angst amongst the different museums and galleries as they jockey for the right to host major exhibitions? Could we perhaps have expected more from the British Museum in demonstrating context, not just putting some of the context into the wall panels and hard-to-read labels?
At the end of the day, I’m not sure that it matters that much to me. I’m just glad that we have the exhibition here in London and I’ve been able to see these lovely pieces. I hope you enjoy them too if you manage to see them.
Gallery B is the first new space @NationalGallery in over 25 years. Until 16 July 2017, it houses a free compare-and-contrast exhibition of Peter Paul Rubens and Rembrandt van Rijn (yes, the Rembrandt). That is the purpose of the new space, which links Gallery A with the other Ground Floor Galleries: to provide a large space that can be used for special displays and exhibitions.
This current display is of existing work, using the juxtaposition to give us new ways of seeing the paintings and in all honesty using a new gallery and this conceit of compare and contrast to get us into the Gallery to see them at all. To that extent, it is a success and it is a great excuse to have a look at two key Dutch painters.
The biggest problem is finding the galleries, especially if you come in from the Sainsbury Wing. It is on the lower floor, level 0. There are four stairways down, two from the main front entrance, a quite narrow staircase next to room 12 to the left of the Central Hall (if you have your back to the main entrance) behind the shop, and the large modern staircase in the East Wing to the right of the Central Hall. (On a Sunday, there is another route via Gallery A at the Northside of the building but I haven’t used it yet so this is speculative.)
There are lifts at the latter two staircases. From the staircase to the left of Central Hall, turn right at the bottom of this staircase and it takes you directly to the entrance to Gallery F from where you walk to the circular Gallery E, turn right through Gallery C and there you are. From the large staircase to the right of Central Hall, make your way through the doorway at the far side of the Espresso Bar and you will find yourself at the entrance to Gallery F.
Once you get there, you’ll see that Gallery B is the shape of a squared off lozenge creating four bays in which to display the art. Large paintings are hung low so we can see them in the middle of the bays with smaller paintings around them. The walls are pale. The lighting is adequate but creates a bit of glare from some angles.
Rubens is on the near wall as you enter and Rembrandt is on the far. This allows you more easily to compare and contrast the two artists. The main wall panels provide some context. The individual labels focus on describing each painting rather than explaining the contrasts. What follows is my impression of the comparisons and contrasts.
There is more colour on the Rubens side of the room with bigger pieces and a tendency to use biblical and mythological stories as subjects. As is often the case, it can be hard to understand what is going on without knowing the original story.
His portraits are perhaps a little more accessible. It seems to me that Rubens was painting in the period of creating likenesses of the subject’s appearance, not simply flattering. Rubens still uses symbols, for example, surrounding his doctor friend, Ludovicus Nonnius, with books and a bust of the Hippocrates (the Greek founder of medicine) but these are real people staring out of the canvass, or wood in Rubens’s case.
I did think his young woman (Portrait of Susanna Lunden(?)) in the so-called straw hat looked a little sickly, pale skin and big eyes, but that might be more about the standards of beauty at the time. She is certainly looking at us a little coyly in her colourful flounces.
I did like the small landscape, A Shepherd with his Flock in a Woody Landscape, even though there is something about it that is twee and overly sentimental. The larger version of the same scene, (The Watering Place) is in Gallery C just outside so it is interesting to compare and contrast the two of them, too.
I implied that Rembrandt’s side of the room has less colour. This is particularly the case of his portraits. They are generally pared back with very little to see but the subject and maybe a chair. But even when there is something to see, such as the sword and the book on his right of An Elderly Man as Saint Paul, it is very hard to see it. I did notice that if I spent longer and looked and looked, my eyes became accustomed to the dark painting as they do to the dark in a low light environment.
One major exception to the lack of colour is Belshazzar’s Feast where Belshazzar’s wealth, the sumptuous and elaborate 17th century dress and jewels of his courtiers and the splendour of the Temple plate are all conveyed and highlighted with thick brushwork.
Then there is Rembrandt’s famous lighting. This features in many of the works but one particularly caught my attention. The Woman taken in Adultery is glowing in the middle of a group in the dark Temple, all looking insignificant against the splendour of the enthroned High Priest above.
If you come to see the new space for one reason alone make it the Portrait of Margaretha de Geer, Wife of Jacob Trip from Portraits of Jacob Trip and his Wife Margaretha de Geer. There are no accoutrements apart from the sober but rich clothing and the shadow of a substantial chair but the hands and the face with the steady gaze from the eyes are compelling. In fact, in all the portraits it is clear that for Rembrandt the eyes have it!
Of course, it’s no longer just about the display in the Gallery. The National Gallery has extensive resources on line. You can do a virtual tour from the comfort of your computer if you can’t come to London. For Gallery B, perhaps because it is a temporary display, the Gallery hasn’t set up the displays in the same way as for other rooms. So, to find the information about the paintings (as of 11 April 2017 when I accessed it this way), the best way to find them is to go to the page about the special exhibition and its related events, click here, then click through to the page about the display itself, then click on the underlined names of the two artists to go to their pages in the A-Z of Artists where you can track down their pictures.
In addition, there was a Facebook Live event where Head of Education, Gill Hart, and Associate Curator of Paintings 1600-1800, Francesca Whitwell Cooper, gave viewers a tour of the paintings. This was simply an audio-visual event that could be accessed live from the National Gallery Facebook page. It was a really good introduction to the exhibition and, for those of us who are new to art appreciation, it gave lots of pointers to look for. The recording of the event is still available. Even if you don’t have Facebook, you seem to be able to play it but I can’t guarantee that. Give it a go by clicking here.
@NationalGallery until 25 June 2017 you can explore the relationship between two great Italian masters, Michelangelo and Sebastiano del Piombo.
The contention of the Gallery is that this was an extraordinary friendship and collaboration in competitive times, and with Michelangelo who was famously prickly, and that it resulted in art that would not have been created by the men working completely alone.
To explore that argument fully, you need to be prepared to study sketches and read letters and consider copies and reproductions of art, or unfinished pieces, rather than see rooms full of finished masterpieces. Now, it depends on how you feel about your art and how likely it is that you will ever go to Italy to see the originals whether you will enjoy this and feel it worth your while.
The North Galleries, to the back of the original building, are mainly rectangular rooms, arranged with compare and contrast work between the two artists or letters and sketches relating to the large work. If you are following the booklet, you will find that in some rooms, you go clockwise and others you go anti clockwise or you start at the far end of the case in the middle. It’s pretty confusing and difficult to navigate.
Room 1 contains work from before they met. The contrasts are Sebastiano’s bright colours and luxuriousness of the Venetian school and his more spontaneous approach, drawing and colouring at the same time. In Michelangelo’s unfinished piece you can see his more methodical approach of planning, drawing, undercoat then finish.
In the second room, you encounter the first key piece, Michelangelo’s Pietà for S. Francesco in Viterbo. Except that you don’t. What you encounter is a cast of that sculpture. I thought it was still wonderful to see but many people, including my partner, were unimpressed because the cast doesn’t have the same properties as the marble.
However, you can see the differences between it and Sebastiano’s painting of the same subject. Michelangelo’s sculpture is realistic; the drapery looks like cloth and the body of Christ is heavy in Mary’s lap. (I did think that the body of Christ was too small relative to Mary, though.) Sebastiano’s painting is very large and I thought the depictions of people were not at all realistic. In particular, it showed a very masculine looking Mary, at least in the body and the face. I assume this is because they were not able to use female models but it did spoil the piece for me. I thought the moon and the landscape in this picture was the best thing about it. By the way, for those who do not know, a Pietà is a portrayal of the Virgin Mary mourning the crucified Christ.
In Room 3 the exhibition reunites three altarpieces for the first time in 500 years. I liked that, even if one is a copy. Then there is The Raising of Lazarus, painted for the Cathedral of Narbonne in France, and a piece you can see normally in the National Gallery Collection. Again, I like the landscape more than anything else about it. There are a lot of letters in this room. The hand writing is so neat! I did wonder whether the letter was actually written by the artist or by a scribe or secretary. There is also a rather lovely painting of the Holy Family, in a domestic setting.
Room 4 is where you’ll find the vaunted, exceptional loan of Michelangelo’s The Risen Christ (1514–15) from the Church of S. Vincenzo Martire in Bassano Romano, Italy. It is in marble but was finished by another artist. I actually preferred the other Risen Christ who seemed stronger and more lifelike, more animated with emotion, even though it is a cast again.
The other much publicised element of the exhibition is in Room 5: a “cutting-edge recreation” of the Borgherini Chapel in S. Pietro in Montorio, Rome. Sebastiano decorated this to partial designs by Michelangelo so it is a clear example of their collaboration. The Gallery has used 3D printing as well as standard construction methods to build the alcove. I found this to be an impressive piece to see, looking at the perspective and how it changes as you move around. I think the sweet spot to see the whole thing is slightly inside the rope, in the centre, which is a shame. Anyway, this was the highlight of the exhibition for me.
Also in Room 5 is a portrait of Michelangelo by Sebastiano. The woollen material and fur collar are exquisite. Originally, this canvass or board, I forget which, held a Madonna and Child by one of Michelangelo’s rivals, Sato. The patron it was painted for didn’t like it so didn’t want it and there would seem sweet revenge to Michelangelo to have his portrait painting out his rival’s the work like this. How nasty they all were with one another! And, how many other wonderful pieces of art, possibly ahead of their time, have been deleted because someone didn’t like them and had the power to destroy them?
In the final room is Sebastiano’s Visitation, painted at the same time as the Lazarus. It shows the Virgin Mary and her cousin, Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, dressed in bright clothing from Sebastiano’s Venetian roots. I liked this but I actually liked the sketch of the two women better. It had more life. The younger woman’s face is smooth and lacking character – based on a boy, perhaps – while Elizabeth’s is much more realistic and full of character.
This was something I noticed throughout the exhibition. In general, I found the art didn’t move me or speak to me even though it is representative of grand masters and praised by our culture. I found the images of Mary were smooth and stylised. However, I did like the glimpses of landscapes on many of the paintings and the images of the older people: Joseph in the picture of the Holy Family and Elizabeth, particularly in the studies for the Visitation, were full of character and compelling.
I came out, having not put in the work to read all the letters and study all the sketches, not being convinced of the main contention but knowing a little bit more about Sebastiano and having enjoyed seeing some key pieces, especially the recreation of the Borgherini Chapel, which really appealed to me. I was, therefore, glad that I’d gone but it wouldn’t be the first choice of things to see if I had limited time.
As always, there is a lot of material on the website for you to study at your leisure. Find links to it here.
@Tate Britain’s David Hockney exhibition is in its last weeks. It’s open until 29 May 2017 and has late night opening in the final weekend: Friday 26, Saturday 27, and Sunday 28 May 2017 until midnight and Monday 29 May 2017 until 21.00. If you can find a way to go, it’s definitely worth the effort. And, if you can find a moment that is less busy, that will be a blessing since it can be hard to move around and even harder to find space in front of the pieces you wish to view.
What an overwhelming and fabulous exhibition! It’s probably not done to complain but there’s almost too much to see, too much of a good thing. There are 12 rooms, spanning his whole life, showing how his art has evolved, using different media: oils, acrylics, drawing, painting, print, photography, video and iPad. Unifying the whole is the question: how does the artist capture the real world in 2D?
There is pretty minimal interpretation in the rooms. Even the AV guide, although very good, selects only one or two pieces in each room to discuss in any detail. It does include audio and video clips of David Hockney discussing his work and that is very interesting especially when juxtaposed with the views of one of the curators on the same piece.
The first room is on the theme of “a play within a play”, demonstrating how Hockney has raised questions about picture-making and perspective across his career. After that, the material is mostly presented chronologically, starting with his demonstrations of versatility in his early work and moving through the famous swimming pool pictures and portrayals of people in his life and places in his life, including the Yorkshire Wolds, to video pieces and art created and played back on iPads.
I appreciated the cleverness of the work in the first few rooms. I thought the story behind the painting of the view of the Swiss Alps in Room 2 was amusing. But the exhibition started to come alive for me in Room 4 with the pictures of California, exploring the straight lines of the buildings and quality of the bright light.
I could have stayed in Room 4 a long time but my companion reminded me there were eight more rooms to go! I liked The Bigger Splash as well as Peter getting out of Nick’s Pool. Hockney asks how you capture something that is constantly moving and has no surface, light on the pool and on the window, and gives a good answer in the picture.
Room 5 has some huge pieces, many portraits and paintings with people, including Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures) from 1972 which I found very beautiful with its backdrop of lush vegetation.
Room 6 is like a respite – smaller drawings, created on Hockney’s travels, capturing a moment on the page – and then it’s on to Room 7 where we see how Hockney has used photographs, not just to capture people and scenes for later portrayal in oil or acrylic, but to create the pictures. He takes photographs of multiple angles or snapshots across time and then lies them side by side to make up a multidimensional picture or takes close-ups of the different bits of the scene then reassembles the whole picture. We really liked the Scrabble Game, showing multiple angles and capturing the passage of time in a still image, and Bolton Abbey, using the photographs to build up the collage. Gregory Swimming, LA March 1982, is interesting because captured in the photographs are the same wavy interference patterns that he had previously portrayed in his paintings.
If I’d appreciated the art in the first rooms, I loved the last four rooms.
Room 9 shows paintings made in and of the Yorkshire Wolds, particularly of a road he drove again and again – The Road Across the Wolds and The Road up Garrowby Hill. One painting, impossible to photograph, because it is a series of images from a long journey, all placed on the canvass, each mini scene seeming to form part of the whole but with its own perspective.
Room 10 contains paintings made after he moved back to Yorkshire for about 10 years from 2003. They were painted en plein air with vibrant crazy colours. Elderflower Blossom Kilham 2006 reminds me of my childhood.
Room 11 contains video art, The Four Seasons. Hockney mounted 9 video cameras on a rig and drove it down a field in Yorkshire once in each of the four seasons. On each wall in the small gallery, there is a group of 9 screens, each showing the film from one camera. The films are synchronised so you can see a slightly different aspect of the view and you can see the same piece of road in each of the seasons. The key to getting the most out of this work is to get into the centre of the room and look around the space. It’s very special. Spot the bird flying across summer, I think it was, and the snow falling from the trees in winter.
The final room is split into two. The first has charcoal drawings of Yorkshire and then more paintings of his house in California. The drawings of Yorkshire, The Arrival of Spring 2013, are a paean to the experience of seeing the countryside awakening to the Spring, an experience we can take for granted but which Hockney found he had missed while living in California. They show five places at five moments between the first shoots and the verdant full blossoming. Fabulous!
In the second half of the room we see the iPad art, shown on screens bigger than the original iPad. What I had not realised was that the iPad not only becomes a canvas but it also records how a drawing or painting is made. You can play back the creation of the piece, seeing how the artist paints, gradually building up the, and correcting, the image. It was fascinating.
I really enjoyed the exhibition and only wish you a quiet moment to appreciate it fully.